PROF ROBERT TOMBS: Mass Immigration is Destabilising Our Country

Last weekend, my cousin's lovely child, not long out of medical school, married her sweetie - a good-looking young doctor from an Indian household.

The Hindu wedding was incredible, colourful and huge fun for everybody. Watching as young English and Indian individuals danced together, I showed that the day was an ideal example of multicultural combination as we all wish it to be.

But it is dangerously ignorant to take these benefits for granted and to anticipate that the meeting of cultures will immediately cause universal love.

The UK has arguably the finest record of any nation in the manner in which, for hundreds of years, it has actually taken in immigrants and refugees from every corner of the planet, using a safe and civilised sanctuary.

From the Huguenot Protestants who left massacres in France throughout the 16th century, to the Jews leaving Nazi genocide throughout the Second World War, right as much as the Ukrainian women and children used shelter today, British tolerance and empathy have been a lifeline for millions.

Now that tolerance is being extended to its limitations. Mass immigration, compounded by people-smuggling on an industrial scale, is destabilising our country.

We must not fall into the trap of expecting that, since it has actually generally worked out fine in the past, Britain can absorb any quantity of group modification.

We have actually never ever seen escalating immigration on anything like the scale of the past twenty years, wites Prof Robert Tombs

History shows that, even here, unexpected increases of migration have actually triggered turmoils that last for centuries. And we have actually never seen intensifying migration on anything like the scale of the past 20 years.

Official figures from the Department for Education revealed on Thursday that white British children are currently the minority in one in 4 schools in England.

This transformation has been specifically marked in our huge cities. At Rockwood Academy in Birmingham, for instance, there was not a single white British student recorded among the 1,084 who attend the school.

Recently also saw the publication of a report from Professor Matt Goodwin at Buckingham University, forecasting that white Britons will be a minority of the population by 2063 - hardly more than a single generation.

By the end of the century, according to his figures, 60 percent of the nation will have been born overseas or will have at least one moms and dad who is an immigrant. By then, more than 19 per cent of Britons will be Muslim (compared to the current 7 percent). Goodwin's projections are based on census information and figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

I suspect these numbers terribly underestimate the real rate of change. They assume a steady increase and steady geopolitical conditions, when we have every factor to anticipate both of those aspects will prove unpredictable.

An anti-immigration protester holds up a placard throughout a demonstration in Dover in 2020

Climate change could have a destructive result on migration, if even one or 2 of the more alarmist theories are substantiated.

Tens of countless individuals in low-lying countries such as Bangladesh could be made homeless if sea levels increase. Millions more would flee their homes if glacial melt in the Himalayas triggered devastating flooding in India.

Civil wars in Sudan, Congo and Eritrea have currently driven massive numbers of people to cross the Mediterranean into Europe. African countries from Nigeria to South Africa remain in danger of tearing themselves apart, and the result would be an enormous rush of people looking for to leave the combating.

These turmoils would be minor compared to the aftermath of war between India and Pakistan, or in the Middle East. In those cases, Europe might see 100 million refugees or more.

Contribute to that the rise of organised criminal offense and people trafficking. For all Sir Keir Starmer's bluster about 'smashing the gangs', he closes his eyes to the fact that this is a multi-billion-pound company - one that will not cease just since he makes speeches.

These are not petty wrongdoers. They are international cartels, who have discovered a profits stream that equals make money from the drugs trade. The Government has no concepts at all about how to stop them.

The numbers of economic migrants making the dangerous crossing from France in overloaded rowboats are mounting, often topping more than 1,000 in a single day.

The cumulative result is mind-blowing. According to your home of Commons library, 44,000 individuals showed up unlawfully in the 12 months to March - and that figure, of course, represents only individuals we understand about. Many more have most likely slipped under the radar, landing undetected or concealed in lorries and containers.

But 44,000 equates to simply 5 per cent of the immigration overall for the year. Legal arrivals surpass the unlawful ones by about 20-to-one.

Nothing in our long and interesting island story has actually ever come close to this. Mass migration, introduced by New Labour under Tony Blair, is a careless experiment in group revolution that has actually never ever been attempted in Britain before.

But it has happened in other places. And for indigenous populations, it has often been dreadful.

When Europeans settled in the Americas, from the 16th century, they required their method on to the land. In Australia and New Zealand - nations that were much less largely populated - there was less massive violence however the result on the aboriginal people was no less disastrous.

Significantly, the British Empire never enabled migration to India, which had actually a big settled population. British topics were encouraged to settle only in sparsely peopled areas: for example, Canada and wide-open parts of Africa such as Kenya.

But in every case, when this procedure began, it was quickly uncontrollable. More than six million Irish emigrants arrived in the US throughout the 19th century, a third of them in the area of less than a decade from 1845.

Almost as lots of Italians emigrated to America, many of them between 1880 and the early 1920s. In a country riven with racial departments, the Italian and Irish neighborhoods battled to endure, frequently obviously by effort, but likewise by political corruption and organised crime.

Starry-eyed Left-wingers like to declare that Britain too is a 'nation of immigrants'. That's entirely disingenuous.

William the Conqueror, who showed up throughout the Channel in 1066 with his own flotilla of boats, brought just about 7,000 men. Yet that small army and the French-speaking Norman immigrants who followed destroyed the native Anglo-Saxon culture and subjugated a whole individuals.

Almost every big Saxon building was destroyed, the judgment elite was replaced, their residential or commercial property seized and the language changed beyond recognition. For centuries, Saxons were forced to labour as serfs, disliked as an inferior race by the colonising elite. Even Saxon saints were demoted.

It took a minimum of 400 years for the aftershocks of the Norman intrusion to go away.

Resentments ran so deep they are still visible in our folk legends: Robin Hood was imagined as a Saxon knight fighting Norman injustice. The concept of this 'Norman Yoke' inspired democrats well into the reign of Victoria.

Even today, nearly a thousand years later on, the Conquest may be embedded in our class system.

A 2011 research study discovered that Britons with names suggesting Norman descent - such as Mandeville, Lacy, Glanville or Percy - were on average 10 percent better off than those with Saxon craftsmen names such as Smith, Cooper, Baker or Shepherd, almost a millennium after the Battle of Hastings.

To understand totally how badly harmed a country can be by unrestrained immigration, we need only take a look at Northern Ireland. During the 17th century, tens of thousands of Scottish protestants migrated to Ulster. Though separated by the Irish Sea, these 2 nations are so close that on a clear day they show up to each other.

This was a state task, started by the Scottish and English governments during James I's reign, and conceived as a way of ending mass poverty in Scotland by encouraging people to live by farming in Ireland.

Well, we all know the result: it resulted in enmity and violence still prevalent today that has actually seen thousands killed over the centuries.

Not all the social inequality in Britain is the result of the Norman invasion, obviously, anymore than all Ireland's Troubles were the effect of a strategy to ease starvation in Scotland.

But when issues have intricate causes, individuals seek easy scapegoats - and migration will constantly supply one.

The UK population is now 69.5 million, according to the ONS. (Many believe it to be

significantly higher). That's a boost of 10 million this century. Yet the birth rate is falling: in 2023 it reached its least expensive rate on record in England and Wales, at 1.44 children per lady, compared to the 'replacement rate' of 2.1 - the number of children needed to keep numbers constant.

If our growing population is not due to giving birth, it needs to be driven by migration.

The falling birth rate is not a new phenomenon. In 1938, it was anticipated that the UK population would peak within five years at 41 million, and that it would then fall steadily for the next three years, to 31 million by 1975.

In the event, this turned out to be nonsense, partly due to the fact that the official stats did not expect the Second World War and the child boom that followed.

But the predictions also stopped working to take account of the beginnings of migration from previous colonies, with lots of thousands arriving from the West Indies after 1948 - the 'Windrush generation' - and Pakistan and India following independence and partition in 1947.

There were other rises, for example from East Africa after the increase of the despot Idi Amin who expelled 80,000 Ugandan Asians, among them the parents of previous Home Secretary Priti Patel.

Crucially, the fantastic majority of these immigrants were figured out to incorporate into British life. If not currently English-speaking, they found out the language. They tried to find work or started businesses. Many brought much needed skills and dynamism.

But that is not the case today. A high percentage of legal immigrants concern do low-paid work, for example in care homes and the hospitality sector. Those who qualify under the federal government visa plan for skilled workers or health and care employees can anticipate to be paid 80 per cent of the basic wage.

Those in the fishing industry, for example, receive ₤ 12.82 an hour, as opposed to ₤ 15.88 for British employees. A similar disparity uses in numerous trades from welding to dance and choreography.

When will white Brits end up being an ethnic minority? Map exposes areas where they already are

This has a threefold impact: earnings are depressed, new arrivals reside in comparative poverty, and numerous British people have actually dropped out of the labour market. Resentments grow on all sides and the cost is unsustainable.

Many other migrants, it needs to be stated, make the most of our generous asylum system - consisting of housing (sometimes in comfortable hotels), food, totally free NHS healthcare and even spending cash.

The best source of resentment, however, comes when immigrants refuse to incorporate. Incredibly, numerous on the Left encourage this by trashing our culture and libelling our history - raising every background except the native one. It spells disaster for our future when immigrants are encouraged to stay locked within their own communities and taught that the British have actually constantly been their enemies.

How harmful this is, we can see by looking throughout the Channel, to France where 2nd and third generation immigrants from North Africa produce a continuous state of discontent. Riots are regular, car-burning is a nationwide sport and extremist political leaders talk of're-migration' - the expulsion of people who 'do not fit in'.

This will be Britain's future if the Government does not take control of the circumstance today. Immigration can benefit everyone, however just if it is strictly handled, democratically accepted and culturally integrated.

Allowed to run out of control, as the arc of history programs, it ruins countries.